In construction accounting, accurately tracking costs is essential for understanding project profitability and maintaining financial health. While direct costs like labor and materials are easy to assign to specific jobs, indirect costs—also known as overhead—are more complex. These costs support multiple projects but don’t tie directly to any single one. Allocating them properly is critical for accurate job costing, competitive bidding, and informed decision-making.
In this post, we’ll explore what indirect costs are, why allocation matters, and the most common methods for allocating them in construction.
Indirect costs are expenses that benefit multiple projects but cannot be traced to a single job without allocation. Common examples include:
Unlike direct costs, which are charged to a specific job, indirect costs require a systematic approach to distribute them fairly across all projects.
Accurate allocation of indirect costs is essential for several reasons:
Failing to allocate indirect costs properly can distort financial statements and lead to poor business decisions.
There is no one-size-fits-all approach. The best method depends on your company’s operations, cost structure, and project mix. Here are the most widely used methods:
How It Works:
Allocate overhead based on each job’s share of total direct labor dollars.
Why Use It:
Ideal for labor-intensive contractors (e.g., electrical, plumbing) where labor drives overhead.
Pros:
Cons:
How It Works:
Allocate overhead based on labor hours worked on each job.
Why Use It:
Useful when labor hours vary significantly between projects.
Pros:
Cons:
How It Works:
Allocate overhead based on each job’s share of total material costs.
Why Use It:
Best for material-intensive contractors (e.g., concrete, steel).
Pros:
Cons:
How It Works:
Allocate overhead based on each job’s share of total direct costs (labor, materials, equipment).
Why Use It:
Provides a balanced approach for companies with mixed cost structures.
Pros:
Cons:
How It Works:
Use different allocation bases for different overhead categories (e.g., labor for supervision, equipment hours for equipment costs).
Why Use It:
Ideal for large contractors with diverse operations.
Pros:
Cons:
Allocating indirect costs is not just an accounting exercise—it’s a strategic necessity. Proper allocation ensures accurate job costing, supports competitive bidding, and provides a clear picture of your company’s financial health. Whether you choose a simple labor-based method or a sophisticated hybrid approach, the key is consistency, accuracy, and regular review.
In an industry where margins are tight and competition is fierce, understanding and managing overhead can be the difference between thriving and merely surviving. Start by evaluating your current allocation method, and make adjustments to ensure your jobs reflect their true cost.