After 15+ years working with hundreds of contractors as a CPA--and now helping companies build their accounting teams—I've watched the same hiring mistakes play out over and over again. They're not mistakes of laziness or carelessness. Most of the time, they're mistakes made by smart operators doing their best inside a broken system.
Here's what I mean.
You've got a growing backlog, cash flow is getting harder to track, and your books are a mess. So you decide to invest in real accounting talent. You post the job, screen resumes, and eventually hire someone with impressive credentials—maybe a CPA, maybe a master's degree, definitely experience at a respected firm.
On paper, it looks like a win.
Then they start.
They can reconcile accounts. They understand GAAP. They can close the books monthly. But when you hand them a WIP schedule and ask what it means for the Henderson project, they stare at it like it's written in another language.
Because for them, it is.
Construction accounting isn't general accounting with a hard hat on. It's a completely different discipline. Percentage-of-completion revenue recognition, overbilling and underbilling, retainage tracking, certified payroll, AIA billing, job cost allocation—these aren't things you pick up in a few weeks of on-the-job training.
So you end up with an expensive hire who can tell you what happened last quarter but can't tell you which jobs are bleeding cash right now. The reports look clean, but they don't drive decisions. And you're still doing the translation work in your head every time you need to make a call on a bid or a change order.
The second trap comes from overcompensating for the first.
You've been burned by the generalist, so this time you prioritize construction experience above all else. Maybe you promote someone from operations. Maybe you hire someone who worked at another contractor and "knows the business."
They get it. They understand why draws take forever, why retainage matters, why job costing needs to tie back to the estimate. They speak your language.
But their accounting skills top out at payroll processing and AP. They can enter data, but they can't analyze it. They can pay bills, but they can't forecast cash. They can run reports, but they can't explain what's hiding inside the numbers.
You've traded one problem for another. Now you have someone who understands the context but can't execute at the level you need. And you're still stuck making decisions on gut feel instead of real financial intelligence.
Here's the uncomfortable truth: most contractors fall into these traps not because they're making bad decisions, but because they're making the best decision available inside a bad system.
That system is local hiring.
When you're limited to candidates who can commute to your office, you're fishing in a tiny pond. What are the odds that the one person who has deep construction accounting experience AND strong technical skills AND is looking for a job AND lives within 30 miles of your shop actually exists?
They're slim.
So you compromise. You pick the best available option and hope you can train around the gaps. Sometimes it works. Usually, it doesn't—at least not at the level you need.
The simplest way to avoid both traps is to stop limiting yourself to your zip code.
When you open the door to remote accounting talent, your candidate pool expands dramatically. You're no longer hoping the right person happens to live nearby. You're searching for the right person, period.
That shift changes everything.
Suddenly you can find candidates who have worked in construction accounting for years—who already understand WIP schedules, job costing, retainage, and everything else that makes this industry different. And because you're drawing from a larger pool, you're more likely to find someone with strong technical skills too.
You're not compromising anymore. You're selecting.
If you're going to hire a remote construction accountant, here's what actually matters:
Construction-specific experience. Have they worked with job costing systems? Do they understand percentage-of-completion accounting? Can they explain overbilling and underbilling without reading from a textbook? This isn't something you can train quickly. Prioritize it.
Software proficiency. Most construction accounting happens in industry-specific platforms—Sage, Viewpoint, Foundation, Procore, QuickBooks with job costing add-ons. The learning curve on these tools is real. Someone who already knows your system (or a comparable one) will be productive faster.
Communication skills. Remote work demands clear, proactive communication. Look for candidates who can explain financial concepts in plain language and who demonstrate responsiveness and organization during the hiring process.
Analytical ability. You're not hiring a data entry clerk. You're hiring someone who can turn numbers into decisions. Ask candidates to walk you through a scenario: "Here's a job that's 60% complete but only 40% billed. What questions would you ask?"
Every month you spend with the wrong accountant in the seat is a month of decisions made on incomplete information. It's a month of cash flow surprises. It's a month where profitable jobs might be masking losers—and you won't know until it's too late to fix them.
In construction, margins are tight and timing is everything. You can't afford to wait 12 months to figure out your accountant isn't working out, then start the search all over again.
Getting this hire right the first time isn't just about saving on recruiting costs. It's about having financial clarity when it matters—so you can bid smarter, manage cash better, and avoid the nasty surprises that sink contractors every year.
Most contractors are stuck choosing between accounting skills and construction knowledge because they're hiring from too small a pool. When you expand your search beyond your local market, you stop making tradeoffs.
That's how you find someone who actually understands both sides of the equation—and that's how you avoid the two most expensive hiring mistakes in construction.