In the fast-paced world of construction, managing costs, materials, and subcontractor relationships can be a daunting task. With multiple projects running simultaneously, contractors often face challenges in maintaining financial discipline and preventing cost overruns. One of the most effective tools for achieving this is the purchase order (PO). While many contractors view POs as just another piece of paperwork, they are, in fact, a cornerstone of strong internal controls and sound construction accounting practices.

This blog post explores why contractors should use purchase orders, how they function as an internal control mechanism, and the benefits they bring to construction businesses.

What Is a Purchase Order in Construction?

A purchase order is a formal document issued by a contractor to a supplier or subcontractor, specifying the type, quantity, and agreed price for materials or services. It serves as a legally binding agreement once accepted by the vendor. In construction, POs are commonly used for:

• Ordering building materials
• Hiring subcontractors for specific tasks
• Procuring equipment rentals

Unlike informal verbal agreements, POs create a clear paper trail that supports accountability and transparency.

Why Contractors Often Skip Purchase Orders

Many small to mid-sized contractors avoid using POs because they perceive them as unnecessary bureaucracy. Common reasons include:

• Time constraints: “We need materials on-site immediately.”
• Informal relationships: “We’ve worked with this supplier for years; we trust them.”
• Lack of systems: “We don’t have software to manage POs.”

While these reasons may seem valid in the short term, skipping POs can lead to significant financial and operational risks, such as duplicate orders, unauthorized purchases, and disputes over pricing.

How Purchase Orders Function as Internal Controls

Internal controls are processes designed to safeguard assets, ensure accurate financial reporting, and promote operational efficiency. In construction accounting, POs play a critical role in these controls by:

1. Preventing Unauthorized Spending

A PO system requires approval before an order is placed. This ensures that only authorized personnel can commit company funds, reducing the risk of fraud or accidental overspending.

2. Establishing Budgetary Control

Each PO can be tied to a specific job cost code or budget line item. This linkage allows project managers and accountants to monitor spending in real time and compare actual costs against the budget, especially when change orders arise.

3. Creating a Clear Audit Trail

POs provide documentation for every purchase, which is essential for audits, financial reviews, and dispute resolution. This transparency helps maintain compliance with internal policies and external regulations.

4. Reducing Errors and Disputes

By clearly stating quantities, prices, and delivery terms, POs minimize misunderstandings between contractors and suppliers. This reduces the likelihood of billing errors and payment disputes.

5. Supporting Three-Way Matching

In construction accounting, three-way matching involves comparing the PO, the supplier’s invoice, and the receiving report before approving payment. This process ensures that the company only pays for goods and services that were actually ordered and received.

Best Practices for Implementing Purchase Orders

To maximize the benefits of POs as an internal control, contractors should follow these best practices:

1. Standardize the PO Process

Create a consistent format for POs and establish clear procedures for issuing, approving, and tracking them. This standardization reduces confusion and ensures compliance across the organization.

2. Integrate POs with Job Costing

Link each PO to a specific project and cost code. This integration provides real-time visibility into project expenses and helps prevent budget overruns.

3. Use Construction Accounting Software

Manual PO systems can be cumbersome and prone to errors. Modern construction accounting software automates the PO process, enabling electronic approvals, real-time tracking, and seamless integration with accounts payable.

4. Set Approval Limits

Define approval thresholds based on dollar amounts or job roles. For example, a project manager might approve POs up to $5,000, while anything higher requires executive approval.

5. Train Your Team

Ensure that project managers, purchasing staff, and accounting personnel understand the importance of POs and how to use them effectively. Training reduces resistance and promotes compliance.

Benefits Beyond Internal Control

While internal control is the primary reason for using POs, contractors also gain several additional benefits:

• Improved Cash Flow Management: POs help forecast upcoming expenses, allowing better cash flow planning.
• Stronger Vendor Relationships: Clear documentation reduces disputes and builds trust with suppliers.
• Enhanced Project Management: Real-time visibility into material orders helps keep projects on schedule.
• Better Financial Reporting: Accurate and timely data from POs improves job cost reports and overall financial statements.

Common Challenges and How to Overcome Them

Despite their advantages, implementing a PO system can present challenges:

• Resistance to Change: Employees may view POs as extra work. Overcome this by explaining the benefits and providing user-friendly tools.
• Delays in Approval: Slow approval processes can delay material delivery. Address this by setting up electronic approval workflows.
• Integration Issues: If your accounting system doesn’t support POs, consider upgrading to a construction-specific platform that does.

Conclusion

Purchase orders are more than just paperwork—they are a vital internal control that protects your construction business from financial risk, improves operational efficiency, and enhances accountability. By implementing a robust PO system, contractors can gain better control over costs, strengthen vendor relationships, and ensure the long-term success of their projects.

In an industry where margins are tight and risks are high, the question isn’t whether you can afford to use purchase orders—it’s whether you can afford not to.

‍